Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Render Services, Inc.

Render Services, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Render Services, Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN FRANCISCO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Render Services, Inc. has raised $6.8M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.8M on 2018-02-21.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2018-02-21.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Render Services, Inc. at approximately $102M (range $9.2M–$555M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.16× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2016–2018 (707 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (116% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 8.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 71% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 83% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Cardinal Memorial Ultimate Holdings, Llc, PASSADO Co Ltd, Baba Joe Diamond Ventures Us Inc., Black Television News Channel, LLC, CannCare, Inc.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.