Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

ReGrained, Inc.

ReGrained, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

ReGrained, Inc. operates in Other, based in BERKELEY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

ReGrained, Inc. has raised $647K in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $285K on 2020-04-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-04-10.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models ReGrained, Inc. at approximately $6.6M (range $190K–$75M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.06× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2019–2021 (1372 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (106% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 21 months.

Last raise 6.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.5× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 28% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 30% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Valued, Inc., CiiTA, LLC, Wnder, LTD, Supernova Discotheque, LLC, TommyKnockers LLC.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.