Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Rae-Wallace Mining Co

Rae-Wallace Mining Co looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Rae-Wallace Mining Co operates in Other, based in SPARKS.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Rae-Wallace Mining Co has raised $308K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $308K on 2011-05-20.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-05-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Rae-Wallace Mining Co at approximately $7.1M (range $205K–$81M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.94× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (1459 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (94% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 15.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 16% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 32% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Suter Joshua Scott, Bigger Picture Group LLC, UCC-LRS Investment, LLC, Garrow Trident, LLC, 1ST Interstate Capital Corp.

Peoplefiled

7 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.