Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Radical Beauty International, Inc.

Radical Beauty International, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Radical Beauty International, Inc. operates in Manufacturing, based in SANTA MONICA.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Radical Beauty International, Inc. has raised $7.8M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.7M on 2015-01-05.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-01-05.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Radical Beauty International, Inc. at approximately $67M (range $9.3M–$365M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.33× the median modeled value of Series A Manufacturing companies in 2013–2015 (70 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (133% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 10 months.

Last raise 11.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 26.9× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 75% of Manufacturing peers (3257 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 83% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: OYO Sportstoys, Inc., Green Bay Packaging Inc, H-Food Holdings, LLC, Tommie Copper Inc., Cyclonaire Holding Corp..

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.