Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Quibi Holdings, LLC

Quibi Holdings, LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Quibi Holdings, LLC operates in Other, based in LOS ANGELES. quibi.com

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Quibi Holdings, LLC has raised $1.8B in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $1.0B on 2018-07-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2019-12-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Quibi Holdings, LLC at approximately $13.3B (range $5.8B–$24.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.47× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2019–2021 (33 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (147% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 6 months.

Last raise 6.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.9× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mickey Barreto Missions, Uber Freight Holding Corp, Saturn Ultimate, Inc., Millennium Top1 Corp, Bellevue Topco, Inc..

Peoplefiled

16 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.