Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 1, 2026

Quaddra Software Inc.

Quaddra Software Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Quaddra Software Inc. operates in Other, based in SUNNYVALE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Quaddra Software Inc. has raised $580K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $580K on 2014-05-27.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-05-27.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Quaddra Software Inc. at approximately $13M (range $387K–$152M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.66× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 12.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 27% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 44% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Produce P&A Fund, LLC, Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc., Music Labs, Inc., SAL Ethika Investments, LLC, Vyance, Inc..

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.