Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Pushkin Industries, Inc.

Pushkin Industries, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Pushkin Industries, Inc. operates in Manufacturing / Industrial, based in NEW YORK.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Pushkin Industries, Inc. has raised $13M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $11M on 2021-03-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-03-10.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Pushkin Industries, Inc. at approximately $90M (range $15M–$416M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.19× the median modeled value of Series A Manufacturing / Industrial companies in 2019–2021 (12 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (119% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 26 months.

Last raise 5.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.6× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 92% of Manufacturing / Industrial peers (629 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 94% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: North Mill Equipment Finance LLC, PG Manufacturing, LLC, Tracked Equipment Holdings LLC, Hashed Industries, LLC, Fox Factory Holding Corp.

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.