Companies · Other Technology
AUSTIN · TX, USA · Other Technology · founded 2017 · http://www.pullrequest.com
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Pullrequest, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→Pullrequest, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Pullrequest, Inc. is one of 21302 Other Technology companies tracked from AUSTIN, TX, USA, on record since 2017. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 73% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
AI analyst read est. — model-extracted from this company's public description, not a verified fact. 30%
operates a technology-led product inferred from public copy
Grounded in: “You are a venture analyst”
Code review as a service - combining automation with a network of…
Code Review as a Service PullRequest is passionate about code quality. From static analysis to an on-demand network of code review experts, we help development teams ship code faster, with improved quality and lower costs.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed, Seed — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 33%.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series A — a $4.0M–$15M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Not enough modeled valuation points to chart a trajectory.
Benchmarked against 21302 companies in Other Technology. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 73% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 88% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series A) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #131 of 815.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Celect, Inc. | Series A | $30.1M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| VictorOps, Inc. | Series A | $36.3M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Ephesoft Inc. | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Resilinc Corp | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Kaarya LLC | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| DiCentral Corp | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Stay Alfred, Inc. | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Rubica, Inc. | Series A | $16.6M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| PocketWatch, Inc. | Series A | $16.8M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| MobileCause, Inc. | Series A | $24.6M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| DynamicAction Holdings, Inc. | Series A | $15.0M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Bench Accounting, Inc. | Series A | $29.9M | $416.1M | 2.60× |
| Pullrequest, Inc. this company | Series A | $10.4M | $287.8M | 1.80× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Series A | $10.4M | 2018-03-30 | $47.2M | $287.8M | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Patterson | — | 4 other | 2018-03 |
| Lyal Avery | — | — | 2018-03 |
Pullrequest, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MYH, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.4M | $288.3M | same sector · same stage |
| Rebellion Photonics, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.4M | $288.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Trello, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.3M | $286.8M | same sector · same stage |
| IIX Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.4M | $289.0M | same sector · same stage |
| OYSTER TRAVEL Corp | Other Technology | Series A | $10.4M | $277.7M | same sector · same stage |
| ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.3M | $285.8M | same sector · same stage |
| Churchill Navigation Inc. | Other Technology | Series A | $10.5M | $281.9M | same sector · same stage |
| DigiTx Partners LLC | Other Technology | Series A | $10.5M | $291.3M | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeStream CodeStream is a Developer Collaboration Platform designed to… | SaaS / Software | — | — | 72% |
| cubic AI-powered code review platform | AI / ML | — | — | 72% |
| Codeball AI-Powered Code Review | AI / ML | — | — | 71% |
| Reflect No-code test automation for web apps | SaaS / Software | — | — | 70% |
| REV1 Claude Code for Mechanical Engineers | — | — | — | 70% |
| hoop.dev Code review for DevOps tasks | Developer Tools | — | — | 69% |
| Stage Code review platform for humans and agents | AI / ML | — | — | 69% |
| SourceDNA Bringing transparency to the app stores and helping developers build… | Developer Tools | — | — | 69% |
See where Pullrequest, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Pullrequest, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.