Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Prowers Aggregate Investors, LLC

Prowers Aggregate Investors, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Prowers Aggregate Investors, LLC operates in Other, based in LITTLETON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Prowers Aggregate Investors, LLC has raised $600K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $600K on 2016-06-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-06-22.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Prowers Aggregate Investors, LLC at approximately $14M (range $400K–$157M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.71× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2016–2018 (1548 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 10.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 28% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 45% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Castleray Mezzanine Partners I, LLC, AFI Holdings, LLC, WWGL Inc., Ride Velo, Inc., ChampAmerica Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.