Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Prophecy Resource Corp.

Prophecy Resource Corp. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Prophecy Resource Corp. operates in Other, based in VANCOUVER.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Prophecy Resource Corp. has raised $350K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $350K on 2009-12-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-12-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Prophecy Resource Corp. at approximately $8.1M (range $233K–$92M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.01× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2007–2009 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (101% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 16.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 18% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 35% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Miche Bag, LLC, Saint James CO, Soundbox Investment, LLC, Summit Brand Holdings, LLC, Alaska Juneau Aeronautics Inc.

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.