Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Project Content, LLC

Project Content, LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Project Content, LLC operates in Other Technology, based in WICHITA.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Project Content, LLC has raised $418K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $309K on 2019-11-15.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-11-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Project Content, LLC at approximately $2.2M (range $71K–$16M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.20× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other Technology companies in 2019–2021 (1021 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports $0–$1M revenue while modeled below niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 24 months.

Last raise 4.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.8× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 15% of Other Technology peers (21302 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 6% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Rabbit Inc., Pegasystems Inc, Vitally, Inc., Zurra, Inc., HR Soft Inc..

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.