Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. operates in Pharmaceuticals, based in HANOVER.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has raised $29M in disclosed capital across 11 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $10M on 2021-02-16.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-02-16.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Processa Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at approximately $239M (range $12M–$1.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.57× the median modeled value of Series A Pharmaceuticals companies in 2019–2021 (76 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 10 months.

Last raise 5.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 4.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 73% of Pharmaceuticals peers (1613 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 71% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Xynomic Pharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc., Honest Globe Inc., Athenen Therapeutics, Inc., Zomedica Pharmaceuticals Corp., CerSci Therapeutics Inc..

Peoplefiled

24 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.