Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Porosome Therapeutics, Inc.

Porosome Therapeutics, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Porosome Therapeutics, Inc. operates in Biotechnology, based in BOSTON.

Sub-sector tags: pharma.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Porosome Therapeutics, Inc. has raised $3.9M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.6M on 2023-09-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-09-08.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Porosome Therapeutics, Inc. at approximately $28M (range $2.6M–$91M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.94× the median modeled value of Seed Biotechnology companies in 2022–2024 (207 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports no revenue, yet is modeled well above niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 4 months.

Last raise 2.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 14 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round stepped up 2.4× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 39% of Biotechnology peers (4293 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 33% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mesentech Inc., Marlinspike Therapeutics, Inc., Microbial Machines, Inc., Pearl Diagnostics, Inc., Crossfire Medical Inc.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.