Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Pineapple, Inc.

Pineapple, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Pineapple, Inc. operates in Other, based in LOS ANGELES.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Pineapple, Inc. has raised $2.6M in disclosed capital across 7 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $720K on 2016-06-29.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-01-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Pineapple, Inc. at approximately $2.9M (range $166K–$21M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.44× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2022–2024 (1723 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (144% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 8 months.

Last raise 4.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 54% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 17% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: El American Inc., AEA Hope, LLC, Joy Milk Tea Inc., Manage Mindfully, Inc., ValiDateMe LLC.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.