Companies · Software / Tech
LOS ANGELES · Software / Tech · refined from filed group “Other”
Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Pictor Labs, Inc. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.→Pictor Labs, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is quiet on financing cadence.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page. Valuation uses the technology sector profile.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Pictor Labs, Inc. is one of 3920 Software / Tech companies tracked from LOS ANGELES. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 86% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). Ladder is contiguous — every modeled rung has a record.
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series B — a $15M–$40M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks scaled by the technology sector profile. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Benchmarked against 3920 companies in Software / Tech. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Raised more than 86% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 79% of peers (estimate).
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series B) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled value est. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #119 of 174.
| Company | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | vs peer med. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argyle Systems Inc. | Series B | $36.7M | $595.9M | 2.91× |
| Shoreline Software, Inc. | Series B | $57.0M | $584.1M | 2.85× |
| ALICE Technologies, Inc. | Series B | $59.6M | $544.6M | 2.66× |
| Tint Technologies Inc. | Series B | $29.6M | $528.0M | 2.58× |
| Vanilla Technologies Inc. | Series B | $49.3M | $496.3M | 2.42× |
| Red Team Software, LLC | Series B | $28.3M | $494.1M | 2.41× |
| LongPath Technologies, Inc. | Series B | $39.8M | $488.3M | 2.38× |
| SmartX Technology Solutions Inc. | Series B | $42.0M | $488.2M | 2.38× |
| On Demand Technologies, Inc. | Series B | $54.9M | $441.5M | 2.15× |
| Meow Technologies Inc. | Series B | $28.1M | $439.9M | 2.15× |
| Paytient Technologies, Inc. | Series B | $53.9M | $436.5M | 2.13× |
| Trunk Technologies, Inc. | Series B | $28.5M | $429.4M | 2.10× |
| Pictor Labs, Inc. this company | Series B | $31.8M | $148.6M | 0.72× |
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
| Stage | Amount · real | Announced | Post-money · est | Value · est | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Seed | $617K | 2020-09-21 | $3.4M | $23.1M | 90% |
| Seed | $3.6M | 2020-09-21 | $18.1M | $110.9M | 90% |
| Series A | $7.6M | 2022-05-23 | $34.6M | $98.1M | 90% |
| Series B | $20.6M | 2024-08-06 | $114.4M | $148.6M | 90% |
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
| Person | Role | Also runs | Tied since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Barclay | — | 7 other | 2024-08 |
| Christopher Wilson | — | 5 other | 2022-05 |
| Robert Crutchfield | — | 4 other | 2024-08 |
| Aydogan Ozcan | — | 1 other | 2020-09 |
| Gilbert Hakim | — | 1 other | 2022-05 |
| Bauke Anninga | — | — | 2022-05 |
| Frank Hsin | — | — | 2022-05 |
| Melih Poyraz | — | — | 2022-05 |
| Polat Sen | — | — | 2024-08 |
| Yair Rivenson | — | — | 2020-09 |
Pictor Labs, Inc. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Raised · real | Value · est | Why similar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Resource Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $32.9M | $134.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Valencia Technologies Corp | Software / Tech | Series B | $32.9M | $126.5M | same sector · same stage |
| Big Watt Digital LLC | Software / Tech | Series B | $30.7M | $135.2M | same sector · same stage |
| Eavor Technologies Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $33.5M | $173.4M | same sector · same stage |
| Archipelago Analytics Holdings, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $34.2M | $184.0M | same sector · same stage |
| Omni Design Technologies, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $34.3M | $182.7M | same sector · same stage |
| Invictus Apps, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $34.4M | $155.4M | same sector · same stage |
| H3X Technologies Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $29.4M | $170.3M | same sector · same stage |
Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.
| Company | Sector | Stage | Value · est | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Picolo Labs Inc | Software / Tech | Seed | $59.6M | 89% |
| Gator Labs Inc. | Software / Tech | Seed | $8.2M | 86% |
| Labr Technologies, Llc | Software / Tech | Pre-Seed | $1.5M | 85% |
| Valar Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $63.3M | 84% |
| Cata Labs Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $39.7M | 83% |
| Visual Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Pre-Seed | $28.4M | 83% |
| Snapshot Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series A | $72.4M | 83% |
| ABXR Labs, Inc. | Software / Tech | Series B | $6.8M | 83% |
See where Pictor Labs, Inc. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Pictor Labs, Inc., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.
Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.