Companies · Other

Peak Partners L.P.

NEWTOWN · Other · https://www.peakpartners.com/

Diligence memoA one-page analyst read on Peak Partners L.P. — recommendation, valuation, rhythm, risks.
$212.7M
Total raised · real
1
Rounds
0.7×
Latest step-up
Top 3%
Sector rank · raised
Series D+
Latest stage · inferred · Wed Mar 25 1992 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time)

Peak Partners L.P. has raised $213M over 1 round; too few niche peers to rank its valuation yet.

Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page.

Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.

Dormant
  • Last raise 34.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
  • Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.

Issuer-vehicle patternmedium confidence

Peak Partners L.P. behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.

Issuer structure
Company-like
No recurring-offering pattern strong enough to override normal financing interpretation.
Lifecycle
34.3 yr record
Peak capital year was 1992 with $2.5B across 13 filings.
Market position
ahead of 98% of Other peers
Capital scale is ahead of 98% of Other peers; modeled value is above 99% of peers by modeled value. Large capital with mid-pack modeled value can signal an issuer/program profile rather than operating-company growth.
Valuation reliability
Lower applicability
Stage/dilution valuation models are weakest when the issuer is broad-sector, recurring, or vehicle-like.
Operating evidence
Some evidence
No clear CEO/founder/principal role is surfaced, so operating-company confidence is lower.
Data quality
Needs review
Row-level filing totals differ from canonical totals, so amendment/superseded filtering should be checked.
What triggered this
  • Legal name looks like an issuer vehicle rather than a product company.
  • Sector is still broad/Other, so operating comparables are weak.
  • No clearly named CEO/founder/principal role in the public records surfaced here.
  • Capital program peaked in 1992: $2.5B across 13 filings.
  • Largest single filing was $212.9M on 1992-03-25.
  • Filing rows sum to $2.6B, while canonical raised total is $212.7M; likely amendments/superseded rows are mixed into the detail view.
How to read the page
  • Read this less like a startup funding journey and more like a capital-raising program.
  • Stage-based valuation and peer labels have lower applicability for this pattern.
  • The more important signal is lifecycle: repeated filings ended years ago, so current activity needs outside confirmation.
  • Canonical filtering should be tightened before using row-level totals for diligence.
Leadership

No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.

Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.

Where it sits in Other

Peak Partners L.P. is one of 25015 Other companies tracked from NEWTOWN. By capital raised it ranks among the largest (ahead of 98% of sector peers), and among the largest by modeled valuation est..

Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.

AI analyst read est. — model-extracted from this company's public description, not a verified fact. 30%

operates a technology-led product inferred from public copy

Grounded in: “You are a venture analyst

Peak Partners SA focus is directed towards superior risk adjusted return production, moderately correlated to traditional capital markets and other investment and trading strategies. Peak Partners SA is convinced that a structured and flexible approach combining direct and non direct investment sche

Peak Partners SA focus is directed towards superior risk adjusted return production, moderately correlated to traditional capital markets and other investment and trading strategies. Peak Partners SA is convinced that a structured and flexible approach combining direct and non direct investment schemes in selected alternative products is the best way to produce stable and non correlated returns. A team of proficient reliable and client driven professionals dedicated to meet your standards of excellence. Best business practice and irreproachable ethics to preserve your interests, our firm's most valuable asset. Crystal clear solutions for your alternative investments. You can also get in touch by filling out the contact form below

Find PEAK PARTNERS online

Trades publicly as PEAK PARTNERS.

As reported in public records reported — not modeled.

US
Jurisdiction
Rule 06
Reg D exemption
72
Investors (latest)
2002-09-01
First sale
Amount raised vs valuation, by round

Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.

Amount raised · realModeled valuation · estCumulative funded · real
$0$1.3B$2.5B$3.8B$5.0BSeries D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $161M (real) Modeled valuation $2.8B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $161M (real) Modeled valuation $2.8B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $212M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $161M (real) Modeled valuation $2.8B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $161M (real) Modeled valuation $2.8B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $213M (real) Modeled valuation $3.7B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 1992-03-25 Raised $161M (real) Modeled valuation $2.8B (est)Series D+1992Series D+ · 2002-09-01 Raised $108M (real) Modeled valuation $1.9B (est)Series D+2002Cumulative $2.6B

The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.

Financing ladder & sequence gaps
Series D+$212.7M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.8M · 1992
Series D+ extension$160.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$160.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.2M · 1992
Series D+ extension$160.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.7M · 1992
Series D+ extension$160.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$212.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$160.9M · 1992
Series D+ extension$107.7M · 2002

Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). No record for: Pre-Seed, Seed, Series A, Series B, Series C — the company may have raised it under a different exemption, merged it into an adjacent record, or skipped it. Sequence completeness: 17%.

Modeled valuation trajectory
$3.7B
Base estimate est.
$1.2B
Conservative case
$8.0B
Upside case
$1.8B
Modeled post-money

Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series D+a $100M–$400M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks. Directional, not a quoted figure.

Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-251992Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $2.8B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $2.8B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $2.8B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $2.8B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $3.7B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $2.8B · 1992-03-25Series D+ · modeled $1.9B · 2002-09-012002
Model inputs · modeled:benchmark-stage-stepup-v1
12%
Dilution assumption
Implied ownership sold in the financing.
85%
Survival probability
68% low · 94% high
1.16×/yr
Annual markup
1.30×/yr upside case
6.0 yr
Elapsed time used
34.3 yr actual, capped for stale marks
general
Sector profile
Adjusts growth and survival by industry.
Financing rhythm
10 mo
Avg between rounds
$20.4M/yr
Capital velocity
34.3 yr
On record since
1992
First round
14
Rounds on file
How it compares to the market

Benchmarked against 25015 companies in Other. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.

Total raised — vs sector median (real $, all stages) 104× above median
This company$212.7M
Sector median$2.0M
Latest round — vs other Series D+ rounds in sector (real $, this stage) 0.9× of median
This company$107.7M
Sector median$125.1M
Modeled value — vs sector median (estimate, all stages) 208× above median
This company$3.7B
Sector median$17.7M

Raised more than 98% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 99% of peers (estimate).

Full financing history

Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.

StageAmount · realAnnouncedPost-money · estValue · estConf.
Series D+$212.7M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B85%
Series D+$212.8M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B90%
Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25$1.3B$2.8B85%
Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B90%
Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25$1.3B$2.8B85%
Series D+$212.2M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B85%
Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25$1.3B$2.8B85%
Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B90%
Series D+$212.7M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B85%
Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25$1.3B$2.8B85%
Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B90%
Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25$1.8B$3.7B90%
Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25$1.3B$2.8B85%
Series D+$107.7M2002-09-01$897.3M$1.9B85%
What happened at each round

Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.

  1. Series D+$212.7M1992-03-25
    • First recorded raise — entered as Series D+.
    • 134 investors on this round.
  2. Series D+$212.8M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 134 investors on this round.
  3. Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 116 investors on this round.
  4. Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 134 investors on this round.
  5. Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 116 investors on this round.
  6. Series D+$212.2M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 133 investors on this round.
  7. Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 116 investors on this round.
  8. Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 134 investors on this round.
  9. Series D+$212.7M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 134 investors on this round.
  10. Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 116 investors on this round.
  11. Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
    • Switched to Rule 506(b) (was Rule 06).
    • 134 investors on this round.
  12. Series D+$212.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round roughly the size of the prior one.
    • 134 investors on this round.
  13. Series D+$160.9M1992-03-25
    • Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
    • Round 1.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • Switched to Rule 06 (was Rule 506(b)).
    • 116 investors on this round.
  14. Series D+$107.7M2002-09-01
    • Raised again after 125 mo — slower than the ~11 mo sector norm.
    • Round 1.5× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
    • 72 investors on this round.
Intelligence
2003 ~Q2
Modeled next raise · ~10mo cadence
$107.7M
Modeled next size est.range $107.7M$172.3M
0.7×
Last step-up
$20.4M/yr
Capital velocity

Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.

Key people & operators

Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.

PersonRoleAlso runsTied since
James A Mehling3 other1992-03
John R Oberkofler3 other1992-03
Raymond E. Ix, Jr.3 other1992-03
Roger E Alcaly3 other1992-03
Timothy J Rudderow3 other1992-03
Frank L Vannerson2 other1992-03
Paul R De Rosa2 other1992-03
Mount Lucas Management Corporation1 other1992-03
Raymond E Ix1 other1992-03
Mount Lucas Management, L.P.1992-03
Registry & provenance

Peak Partners L.P. is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.

United States
Country of record
US
Jurisdiction
890729
SEC CIK
Similar companies

Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.

CompanySectorStageRaised · realValue · estWhy similar
Peak Select Partners L.P.OtherSeries D+$151.7M$2.6Bnetwork8 shared operators · same sector · same stage
MidOcean PPL Holdings Corp.OtherSeries D+$213.0M$3.7Bsame sector · same stage
Gerson Lehrman Group, Inc.OtherSeries D+$211.5M$3.7Bsame sector · same stage
NAVEX TopCo, Inc.OtherSeries D+$213.9M$3.7Bsame sector · same stage
Shermco Aggregator, LPOtherSeries D+$210.9M$3.6Bsame sector · same stage
Panavision IncOtherSeries D+$215.5M$3.6Bsame sector · same stage
Remy International, Inc.OtherSeries D+$217.0M$3.7Bsame sector · same stage
ScriptDash Inc.OtherSeries D+$208.1M$2.2Bsame sector · same stage
Semantically similar

Matched by meaning, not labels — a local language model reads each company's name, sector and description and ranks the closest in that learned space. This catches look-alikes that cross sector boundaries; the structured list above explains its matches, this one trusts the text. Directional, like every modeled signal here.

CompanySectorStageValue · estMatch
Peak Select Partners L.P.
Helping companies become more successful through placement & staffing for IT, legal & corporate operations jobs as well as mergers & acquisitions consulting services.
OtherSeries D+$2.6B73%
BMP MTP Investment, LPOtherSeed$25.0M70%
Peak Business Advisors Limited
British private limited company, based in High Peak. Sector: Professional Services.
Professional Services70%
TP Equity Investment, LLCOtherSeries A$44.9M69%
Diversified Alternative Investments, LLCBusiness ServicesPre-Seed$944K69%
NFP Ultimate Holdings, LLC
Discover tailored insurance and consulting solutions that fit your life and business. Contact us today for personalized guidance and expert support.
InsuranceGrowth/Late$3.5B69%
South Mountain Partners, LLCOtherPre-Seed$4.4M68%
PRM Integra Peaks Investors LLCOtherSeries A$57.7M68%
Frequently asked
How much funding has Peak Partners L.P. raised?
Peak Partners L.P. has raised approximately $212.7M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded financing round, aggregated from public filings.
What is Peak Partners L.P.'s estimated valuation?
Provath's modeled valuation for Peak Partners L.P. is approximately $3.7B (modeled range $1.2B–$8.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate derived from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
What funding stage is Peak Partners L.P. at?
Peak Partners L.P.'s latest modeled financing stage is Series D+. Its most recent recorded round closed around Wed Mar 25.
What does Peak Partners L.P. do and where is it based?
Peak Partners L.P. operates in the Other sector, based in NEWTOWN. Peak Partners SA focus is directed towards superior risk adjusted return production, moderately correlated to traditional capital markets and other investment and trading strategies. Peak Partners SA is convinced that a structured and flexible approach combining direct and non direct investment sche
Explore related

See where Peak Partners L.P. sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.

Is this your company?

If you work at Peak Partners L.P., claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.

Is this your company? Update your profile or add contact details — and choose exactly who can reach you. Reviewed before anything is published.