Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Pasha Group

Pasha Group looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Pasha Group operates in Other, based in San Rafael.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Pasha Group has raised $80M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $45M on 2018-03-26.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2018-03-26.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Pasha Group at approximately $772M (range $174M–$2.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.89× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2016–2018 (135 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (89% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 21 months.

Last raise 8.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 1.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 96% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: C.K. Futures, Llc, Corey Moffitt Trust, Blockvest LLC, Mel Investment Holdings, Llc, Nash Holdings, Inc. (Robert Nash, President).

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.