Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Parable Sciences, Inc.

Parable Sciences, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Parable Sciences, Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN JOSE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Parable Sciences, Inc. has raised $16M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $10M on 2016-12-22.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2019-07-29.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Parable Sciences, Inc. at approximately $81M (range $7.3M–$440M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.00× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2019–2021 (858 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (100% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 31 months.

Last raise 6.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 83% of Other peers (25008 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 80% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: 3901 Campbellton Rd., LLC, No More Landfills Investment Group, LLC, medpai group, WestCap Bolt, LLC, HBC Management Class B L.P..

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.