Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Pacific International Energy Solutions Inc.

Pacific International Energy Solutions Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Pacific International Energy Solutions Inc. operates in Other Energy, based in HONOLULU.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Pacific International Energy Solutions Inc. has raised $3.4M in disclosed capital across 9 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $896K on 2014-03-18.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2022-11-11.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Pacific International Energy Solutions Inc. at approximately $3.2M (range $317K–$18M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.60× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other Energy companies in 2022–2024 (84 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Issuer reports no revenue, yet is modeled well above niche peers.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 12 months.

Last raise 3.6 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 12 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round stepped up 4.2× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 50% of Other Energy peers (2049 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 18% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Sol Clarity, Inc., Helios CoreShell Partners, LLC, Trinary Solar Group IV LLC, SunTrain, Inc., Advanced Thermovoltaic Systems, LLC.

Peoplefiled

6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.