Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

P/E Capital DAO LLC

P/E Capital DAO LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

Diligence furtherNo decisive signal either way from the public record alone — the call needs primary diligence beyond the filings.

Businessfiled

P/E Capital DAO LLC operates in Other, based in JACKSON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

P/E Capital DAO LLC has raised $70M in disclosed capital across 7 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $10M on 2022-12-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2026-02-26.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models P/E Capital DAO LLC at approximately $28M (range $14M–$41M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.43× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2025–2027 (487 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (143% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.

Last raise 4 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 95% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 61% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Sea Court GP, LLC, Kastle Biopartners II LP, Econic Investment LLC, DCFC Holdings, LLC, HeadVantage Corp.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.