Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Ousland Holdings, Inc.

Ousland Holdings, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Ousland Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in AUSTIN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Ousland Holdings, Inc. has raised $240M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $240M on 2014-05-13.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-05-13.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Ousland Holdings, Inc. at approximately $4.1B (range $1.4B–$9.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.50× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2013–2015 (90 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 12.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 98% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 99% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Campaign Monitor Holdings (UK) Ltd, Tomahawk Holdings, Inc., Cornell Capital Special Situations Partners II LP, Liberty Resources II, LLC, Resolute Investment Holdings, LLC.

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.