Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

OSP Hamilton Holdings, LLC

OSP Hamilton Holdings, LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

OSP Hamilton Holdings, LLC operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

OSP Hamilton Holdings, LLC has raised $158M in disclosed capital across 7 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $85M on 2021-12-28.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-05-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models OSP Hamilton Holdings, LLC at approximately $9.8M (range $3.9M–$17M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.02× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2022–2024 (192 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.

Last raise 3.2 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round was 23.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 98% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 38% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Wild Type, Inc., Thingy Thing Inc., Intelycare, Inc., CertiK Global Ltd., Ivanhoe Electric Inc..

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.