Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
OSP Gannett Holdings, LLC
OSP Gannett Holdings, LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
OSP Gannett Holdings, LLC operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
OSP Gannett Holdings, LLC has raised $751M in disclosed capital across 15 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).
Largest single filing: $316M on 2022-12-20.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2026-02-05.
Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models OSP Gannett Holdings, LLC at approximately $9.3M (range $7.0M–$11M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.01× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2025–2027 (50 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.
Last raise 5 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.
The last round was 1.7× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 37% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: AP Adhesives Acquisitions, Inc., INNOVATE Corp., Curaleaf Holdings, Inc., Phantom Parent, LP, Impulse Space, Inc..
Peoplefiled
10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.
Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.