Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Open Doors Partners, Llc

Open Doors Partners, Llc looks under-valued against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

SourceModeled below same-niche peers while still financing on rhythm — a potential mispricing worth a closer look.

Businessfiled

Open Doors Partners, Llc operates in Other, based in WOODSIDE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Open Doors Partners, Llc has raised $36M in disclosed capital across 42 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $4.8M on 2025-11-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-12-29.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Open Doors Partners, Llc at approximately $1.5M (range $711K–$2.3M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.08× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2025–2027 (487 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.

Last raise 6 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round was 9.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 91% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 9% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Sea Court GP, LLC, Kastle Biopartners II LP, Econic Investment LLC, DCFC Holdings, LLC, HeadVantage Corp.

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.