Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Ooyala Holdings, Inc.

Ooyala Holdings, Inc. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Ooyala Holdings, Inc. operates in Other, based in MELBOURNE.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Ooyala Holdings, Inc. has raised $408M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $408M on 2014-09-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-09-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Ooyala Holdings, Inc. at approximately $7.2B (range $3.2B–$13.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.87× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2013–2015 (26 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (87% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 11.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: J M SMUCKER Co, Dealer Tire Holdings, LLC, Overseas Shipholding Group Inc, Balboa Holdings LP, Boxer Parent Co Inc.

Peoplefiled

4 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.