Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp operates in Other, based in DANBURY.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp has raised $128M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).
Largest single filing: $48M on 2014-01-14.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-08-20.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp at approximately $686M (range $155M–$1.8B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.80× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2013–2015 (148 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (80% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 11 months.
Last raise 11.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 1.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 97% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 95% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Island Timberlands Finance Corp, Layne Christensen Co, Autotask Superior Holding, Inc., Creative Artists Agency Holdings LLC, Concord Resources Ltd.
Peoplefiled
22 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.