Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

NVA Holdings L.P.

NVA Holdings L.P. looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

NVA Holdings L.P. operates in Other, based in AGOURA HILLS. The NVA leadership team is dedicated to servant leadership supporting those who care for the animals and the people who love them.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

NVA Holdings L.P. has raised $439M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $439M on 2020-02-19.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-02-19.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models NVA Holdings L.P. at approximately $7.8B (range $3.4B–$14.0B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.86× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2019–2021 (33 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (86% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 6.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 99% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 100% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mickey Barreto Missions, Uber Freight Holding Corp, Saturn Ultimate, Inc., Millennium Top1 Corp, Bellevue Topco, Inc..

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.