Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

NJ/NY Gotham Football Club LLC

NJ/NY Gotham Football Club LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is quiet on financing cadence.

WatchModeled above niche peers — entry today likely prices in growth not yet evidenced in the filings.

Businessfiled

NJ/NY Gotham Football Club LLC operates in Other, based in WHIPPANY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

NJ/NY Gotham Football Club LLC has raised $59M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $34M on 2021-12-28.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-03-14.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models NJ/NY Gotham Football Club LLC at approximately $130M (range $63M–$204M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.53× the median modeled value of Series B Other companies in 2025–2027 (207 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 19 months.

Last raise 16 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Slightly overdue versus sector cadence.

The last round was 1.3× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 85% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Acorn Sim Investor Holdings, LLC, Aircapture, Inc., Bathhouse Holdings Inc., Chlorum Solutions USA LLC, Olympus Pines LLC.

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.