Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Nexeo Solutions, Inc.

Nexeo Solutions, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Nexeo Solutions, Inc. operates in Other, based in The Woodlands.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Nexeo Solutions, Inc. has raised $235M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series D+ (a $100M–$400M round).

Largest single filing: $235M on 2016-06-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-06-09.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Nexeo Solutions, Inc. at approximately $4.1B (range $1.3B–$8.9B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.87× the median modeled value of Series D+ Other companies in 2016–2018 (88 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 10.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 98% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 99% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Beacon Roofing Supply Inc, BIB Merchant Voucher Receivables Ltd, Marlin9 Holdings, Inc., Crackle Holdings, L.P., Optimize Topco, Inc..

Peoplefiled

18 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.