Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

NatPets, LLC

NatPets, LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

NatPets, LLC operates in Other, based in Boulder.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

NatPets, LLC has raised $17M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $12M on 2014-05-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2016-03-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models NatPets, LLC at approximately $79M (range $7.2M–$432M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.91× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2016–2018 (707 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (91% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 22 months.

Last raise 10.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.2× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 84% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 80% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Hogsalt Investors Llc, Fanchise League Co LLC, CannCare, Inc, Baba Joe Diamond Ventures Us Inc., Instapage, Inc..

Peoplefiled

17 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.