Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

National Payroll Funding LLC

National Payroll Funding LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

National Payroll Funding LLC operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

National Payroll Funding LLC has raised $669K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $669K on 2009-03-09.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-03-09.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models National Payroll Funding LLC at approximately $15M (range $446K–$175M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.93× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2007–2009 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 17.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 29% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 47% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Miche Bag, LLC, Saint James CO, Soundbox Investment, LLC, Summit Brand Holdings, LLC, Alaska Juneau Aeronautics Inc.

Peoplefiled

5 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.