Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

NakedPoppy, Inc.

NakedPoppy, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

NakedPoppy, Inc. operates in Other, based in OAKLAND.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

NakedPoppy, Inc. has raised $7.8M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $4.1M on 2017-10-10.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-09-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models NakedPoppy, Inc. at approximately $28M (range $3.7M–$117M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.35× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2019–2021 (858 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 16 months.

Last raise 4.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 2.7× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 74% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 62% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: No More Landfills Investment Group, LLC, 3901 Campbellton Rd., LLC, medpai group, WestCap Bolt, LLC, HBC Management Class B L.P..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.