Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Monument Ventures Inc. WY

Monument Ventures Inc. WY looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Monument Ventures Inc. WY operates in Other, based in SHERIDAN.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Monument Ventures Inc. WY has raised $1.7M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $1.0B on 2021-08-25.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2021-09-20.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Monument Ventures Inc. WY at approximately $26M (range $13M–$42M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.00× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2019–2021 (33 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 0 months.

Last raise 4.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 46% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 60% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Mickey Barreto Missions, Uber Freight Holding Corp, Saturn Ultimate, Inc., Millennium Top1 Corp, Bellevue Topco, Inc..

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.