Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026
Miche Blocker Super Senior 3 Preferred Holdings, LLC
Miche Blocker Super Senior 3 Preferred Holdings, LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Miche Blocker Super Senior 3 Preferred Holdings, LLC operates in Other, based in RADNOR.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Miche Blocker Super Senior 3 Preferred Holdings, LLC has raised $5.7M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $5.7M on 2014-01-17.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-01-17.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Miche Blocker Super Senior 3 Preferred Holdings, LLC at approximately $86M (range $7.7M–$465M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.97× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (97% of peer median) for its niche.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Last raise 12.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 68% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 81% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc..
Peoplefiled
3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.