Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

MFI Holding Corp

MFI Holding Corp looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

MFI Holding Corp operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

MFI Holding Corp has raised $719M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Growth/Late (a round over $400M).

Largest single filing: $482M on 2010-05-20.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2010-07-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models MFI Holding Corp at approximately $4.2B (range $1.8B–$7.6B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.41× the median modeled value of Growth/Late Other companies in 2010–2012 (16 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 2 months.

Last raise 15.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 100% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 99% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Healthcare Technology Holdings, Inc., Conagra Foods Inc /De/, Chinos Holdings, Inc., Griffey Investors, L.P., Visteon Corp.

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.