Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

MediaHound, Inc.

MediaHound, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

MediaHound, Inc. operates in Other Technology, based in EL SEGUNDO.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

MediaHound, Inc. has raised $58M in disclosed capital across 25 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series B (a $15M–$40M round).

Largest single filing: $40M on 2018-07-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2020-03-31.

Filings read as a recurring offering program rather than a clean venture-stage ladder — interpret stage labels and step-ups with that in mind.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models MediaHound, Inc. at approximately $195M (range $16M–$751M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.39× the median modeled value of Series B Other Technology companies in 2019–2021 (415 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 3 months.

Last raise 6.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 12.6× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 94% of Other Technology peers (21302 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 83% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Visual Lease, LLC, Decisions, LLC, Suvoda LLC, SmartRecruiters, Inc., Litify Inc..

Peoplefiled

9 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.

Recurring-offering pattern: stage-based valuation has lower applicability.