Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Maverick Minerals Corp

Maverick Minerals Corp looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Maverick Minerals Corp operates in Other, based in SASKATCHEWAN CANADA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Maverick Minerals Corp has raised $448K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $448K on 2009-02-13.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-02-13.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Maverick Minerals Corp at approximately $10M (range $298K–$117M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.29× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2007–2009 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (129% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 17.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 21% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 39% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Miche Bag, LLC, Saint James CO, Soundbox Investment, LLC, Summit Brand Holdings, LLC, Alaska Juneau Aeronautics Inc.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.