Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Marketing Consultants Group LLC

Marketing Consultants Group LLC looks fair against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Marketing Consultants Group LLC operates in Other, based in GREEN BAY.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Marketing Consultants Group LLC has raised $100M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series C (a $40M–$100M round).

Largest single filing: $50M on 2022-03-04.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-05-09.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Marketing Consultants Group LLC at approximately $486M (range $193M–$865M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 0.91× the median modeled value of Series C Other companies in 2022–2024 (192 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (91% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 12 months.

Last raise 3.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

The last round stepped up 1.0× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 96% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 94% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Wild Type, Inc., Thingy Thing Inc., Intelycare, Inc., CertiK Global Ltd., Ivanhoe Electric Inc..

Peoplefiled

1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.