Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

MAR Systems, Inc.

MAR Systems, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

MAR Systems, Inc. operates in Other, based in SOLON.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

MAR Systems, Inc. has raised $4.7M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $3.4M on 2013-07-02.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2013-07-02.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models MAR Systems, Inc. at approximately $63M (range $3.0M–$491M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.92× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (998 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 22 months.

Last raise 13.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 15.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 65% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 75% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Bodri Capital Management, LLC, as Trustee under that certain Declaration of Trust dated December 17, 2015, 76826774, Llc, 76826773, Llc, 76826772, Llc, EW Investor, LLC.

Peoplefiled

11 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.