Maple Tree Holdings LP looks fair against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Raised $20M across 17 disclosed rounds, last modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Modeled value is 0.80× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Last raise 13.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Latest round stepped up 1.8× from the prior — scaling.
Synthesized from the figures below est. — every claim rests on a number shown on this page.
Analyst read est. — computed against this company's niche peers in the same era. Inputs shown; not a quoted figure.
Fair
Modeled value is 0.80× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Within the normal band (80% of peer median) for its niche.
Dormant
Last raise 13.5 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
Procedural diagnosis est. — rule-based common-sense checks over the filing pattern, issuer name, activity cadence, and surfaced operating evidence.
Issuer-vehicle patternmedium confidence
Maple Tree Holdings LP behaves more like a recurring private-offering issuer than a conventional venture-backed operating company.
Issuer structure
Company-like
No recurring-offering pattern strong enough to override normal financing interpretation.
Lifecycle
16.5 yr record
Peak capital year was 2012 with $17.3M across 8 filings.
Market position
ahead of 86% of Other peers
Capital scale is ahead of 86% of Other peers; modeled value is above 78% of peers by modeled value. Large capital with mid-pack modeled value can signal an issuer/program profile rather than operating-company growth.
Valuation reliability
Lower applicability
Stage/dilution valuation models are weakest when the issuer is broad-sector, recurring, or vehicle-like.
Operating evidence
Sparse
No clear CEO/founder/principal role is surfaced, so operating-company confidence is lower.
Data quality
Consistent
Canonical totals and visible filing detail are broadly aligned.
What triggered this
Legal name looks like an issuer vehicle rather than a product company.
Sector is still broad/Other, so operating comparables are weak.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal role in the public records surfaced here.
No verified homepage on the profile yet.
Capital program peaked in 2012: $17.3M across 8 filings.
Largest single filing was $4.8M on 2012-12-31.
How to read the page
Read this less like a startup funding journey and more like a capital-raising program.
Stage-based valuation and peer labels have lower applicability for this pattern.
The more important signal is lifecycle: repeated filings ended years ago, so current activity needs outside confirmation.
Leadership
No named principal in this company's public records yet — see all operators below.
Explore how these operators interlock with other companies in the operator network.
Where it sits in Other
Maple Tree Holdings LP is one of 25008 Other companies tracked from Chicago. By capital raised it ranks in the upper tier (ahead of 86% of sector peers), and in the upper tier by modeled valuation est..
Ranking is computed against this company's own sector cohort — reported capital is fact; valuation tiers are modeled.
As reported in public records reported — not modeled.
US
Jurisdiction
Amount raised vs valuation, by round
Solid bars are reported offering amounts reported; hatched bars are the modeled post-money valuation est. — both on one shared scale so you can read raise-vs-worth at each round directly. Use the toggles to overlay data labels and the niche-peer / market average value lines.
Amount raised · realModeled valuation · estCumulative funded · real
The line shows cumulative reported funding over the period; + labels show new capital added between points when there is room. Toggle on-bar figures, plus the niche-peer and market averages, to read this company against its cohort. Benchmarks are modeled medians.
Financing ladder & sequence gaps
Pre-Seed$400K · 2009
Pre-Seed extension$250K · 2009
Pre-Seed extension$200K · 2010
Pre-Seed extension$500K · 2010
Pre-Seed extension$125K · 2011
Pre-Seed extension$500K · 2011
Pre-Seed extension$100K · 2011
Pre-Seed extension$200K · 2011
Pre-Seed extension$850K · 2011
Pre-Seed extension$1.0M · 2012
Pre-Seed extension$300K · 2012
Pre-Seed extension$600K · 2012
Pre-Seed extension$200K · 2012
Series A$4.8M · 2012no Seed on file
Series A extension$4.8M · 2012
Bridge · Series A-stage$2.0M · 2012smaller follow-on
Bridge · Series A-stage$3.6M · 2012smaller follow-on
Stages are modeled from round size (public records carry no series label). Ladder is contiguous — every modeled rung has a record.
Modeled valuation trajectory
$72.6M
Base estimate est.
$6.5M
Conservative case
$395.0M
Upside case
$21.8M
Modeled post-money
Round size and date are reported; the stage label is inferred from round size (latest is Series A — a $4.0M–$15M round). Valuation is modeled from stage benchmarks. Directional, not a quoted figure.
Model inputs · modeled:benchmark-stage-stepup-v1
22%
Dilution assumption
Implied ownership sold in the financing.
55%
Survival probability
30% low · 75% high
1.35×/yr
Annual markup
1.70×/yr upside case
6.0 yr
Elapsed time used
13.5 yr actual, capped for stale marks
general
Sector profile
Adjusts growth and survival by industry.
Financing rhythm
2 mo
Avg between rounds
$6.7M/yr
Capital velocity
16.5 yr
On record since
2009
First round
17
Rounds on file
How it compares to the market
Benchmarked against 25008 companies in Other. Each bar is a median (the middle company, not an average — outliers don't skew it). Two yardsticks: real money raised (reported on Form D) and modeled value (our estimate est.). These are whole-sector medians across all stages, except the per-stage row.
Total raised — vs sector median (real $, all stages)▲ 10.0× above median
This company$20.4M
Sector median$2.0M
Latest round — vs other Series A rounds in sector (real $, this stage)▼ 0.6× of median
This company$3.6M
Sector median$5.7M
Modeled value — vs sector median (estimate, all stages)▲ 4.1× above median
This company$72.6M
Sector median$17.7M
Raised more than 86% of sector peers (real $). Modeled value above 78% of peers (estimate).
Niche peers — same stage & era
A tighter cohort than the sector chart above — only companies at the same stage (Series A) that last raised in the same ~3-year era, ranked by modeled valueest. (not money raised). This is the exact set the analyst read compares against, so a like-for-like cohort is what makes "over/under-valued" meaningful. This company ranks #444 of 632.
Stage is inferred from round size est., not reported on the filing — a round's dollar size maps to a bucket: Pre-Seed <$1.0M · Seed $1.0M–$4.0M · Series A $4.0M–$15M · Series B $15M–$40M · Series C $40M–$100M · Series D+ $100M–$400M · Growth/Late >$400M.
Stage
Amount · real
Announced
Post-money · est
Value · est
Conf.
Pre-Seed
$400K
2009-12-17
$2.2M
$9.2M
90%
Pre-Seed
$250K
2009-12-31
$1.4M
$5.8M
90%
Pre-Seed
$200K
2010-05-25
$1.1M
$4.6M
90%
Pre-Seed
$500K
2010-06-04
$2.8M
$11.6M
90%
Pre-Seed
$125K
2011-04-01
$694K
$2.9M
90%
Pre-Seed
$500K
2011-07-01
$2.8M
$11.6M
90%
Pre-Seed
$100K
2011-08-01
$556K
$2.3M
90%
Pre-Seed
$200K
2011-10-01
$1.1M
$4.6M
90%
Pre-Seed
$850K
2011-12-31
$4.7M
$19.6M
90%
Pre-Seed
$1.0M
2012-07-02
$5.6M
$23.1M
90%
Pre-Seed
$300K
2012-08-15
$1.7M
$6.9M
90%
Pre-Seed
$600K
2012-09-01
$3.3M
$13.9M
90%
Pre-Seed
$200K
2012-11-01
$1.1M
$4.6M
90%
Series A
$4.8M
2012-12-31
$21.8M
$72.5M
90%
Series A
$4.8M
2012-12-31
$21.8M
$72.6M
90%
Seed
$2.0M
2012-12-31
$10.0M
$37.2M
90%
Seed
$3.6M
2012-12-31
$18.0M
$66.9M
90%
What happened at each round
Step-up, pace versus the sector's normal cadence, and revenue/exemption moves — read straight from the reported round facts reported.
Pre-Seed$400K2009-12-17
First recorded raise — entered as Pre-Seed.
Pre-Seed$250K2009-12-31
Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
Round 1.6× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Pre-Seed$200K2010-05-25
Came back fast: 5 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round roughly the size of the prior one.
Pre-Seed$500K2010-06-04
Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
Round 2.5× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Pre-Seed$125K2011-04-01
Raised 10 mo later, in step with the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 4.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Pre-Seed$500K2011-07-01
Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 4.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Pre-Seed$100K2011-08-01
Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 5.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Pre-Seed$200K2011-10-01
Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Pre-Seed$850K2011-12-31
Came back fast: 3 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 4.3× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Pre-Seed$1.0M2012-07-02
Came back fast: 6 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round roughly the size of the prior one.
Pre-Seed$300K2012-08-15
Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 3.3× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Pre-Seed$600K2012-09-01
Came back fast: 1 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 2.0× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Pre-Seed$200K2012-11-01
Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 3.0× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Series A$4.8M2012-12-31
Came back fast: 2 mo vs the ~11 mo sector norm.
Round 23.9× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Series A$4.8M2012-12-31
Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
Round roughly the size of the prior one.
Seed$2.0M2012-12-31
Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
Round 2.4× smaller than the prior — bridge or down round.
Seed$3.6M2012-12-31
Filed alongside the prior round (same month) — likely a tranche or amendment.
Round 1.8× larger than the prior — scaling up.
Intelligence
2013 ~Q1
Modeled next raise · ~2mo cadence
$6.5M
Modeled next size est.range $4.2M–$10.4M
1.8×
Last step-up
$6.7M/yr
Capital velocity
Predictive signals are modeled est. from this company's own cadence and step-up, plus sector benchmarks — directional, not advice. Peer set and a CSV export live in your analyst workspace.
Key people & operators
Officers, directors and promoters named in this company's public recordsreported — the people who run it (not its investors). "Also runs" counts come from name-matching across all records, so verify before acting.
Maple Tree Holdings LP is an official record sourced from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. data is aggregated from SEC Form D filings.
United States
Country of record
US
Jurisdiction
1405062
SEC CIK
Similar companies
Nearest neighbours across the whole database — matched on sector, stage and capital scale, and on shared operators (officers or directors named at both companies in public filings). A discovery shortlist, not a valuation cohort — verify before acting, the same way modeled figures are directional.
How much funding has Maple Tree Holdings LP raised?
Maple Tree Holdings LP has raised approximately $20.4M in disclosed capital across 17 recorded financing rounds, aggregated from public filings.
What is Maple Tree Holdings LP's estimated valuation?
Provath's modeled valuation for Maple Tree Holdings LP is approximately $72.6M (modeled range $6.5M–$395.0M). This is an algorithmic estimate derived from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
What funding stage is Maple Tree Holdings LP at?
Maple Tree Holdings LP's latest modeled financing stage is Series A. Its most recent recorded round closed around Mon Dec 31.
What does Maple Tree Holdings LP do and where is it based?
Maple Tree Holdings LP operates in the Other sector, based in Chicago.
Explore related
See where Maple Tree Holdings LP sits in the wider market — its sector, location and stage cohorts, each with their own leaderboards and capital-flow timelines.
If you work at Maple Tree Holdings LP, claim this profile or suggest a correction. We aggregate from public filings, so help us keep your description, website and links accurate.