Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

M-Prep Inc.

M-Prep Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

M-Prep Inc. operates in Other, based in SAN LUIS OBISPO.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

M-Prep Inc. has raised $767K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $592K on 2014-05-16.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-05-16.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models M-Prep Inc. at approximately $14M (range $394K–$155M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.69× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 16 months.

Last raise 12.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 3.4× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 32% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 45% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.