Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026

Loch Lomond Members Golf Club Ltd

Loch Lomond Members Golf Club Ltd looks fair against its niche peers and is active on financing cadence.

Diligence furtherNo decisive signal either way from the public record alone — the call needs primary diligence beyond the filings.

Businessfiled

Loch Lomond Members Golf Club Ltd operates in Other, based in Grand Cayman.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Loch Lomond Members Golf Club Ltd has raised $15M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $8.2M on 2025-06-30.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2025-06-30.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Loch Lomond Members Golf Club Ltd at approximately $28M (range $11M–$48M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Fair. Modeled value is 1.44× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2025–2027 (487 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era. Within the normal band (144% of peer median) for its niche.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 87 months.

Last raise 12 mo ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Raising on or ahead of the sector's normal rhythm.

The last round stepped up 1.1× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 83% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 61% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Sea Court GP, LLC, Kastle Biopartners II LP, Econic Investment LLC, DCFC Holdings, LLC, HeadVantage Corp.

Peoplefiled

22 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.