Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Lifestyle Media Partners, Inc.

Lifestyle Media Partners, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Lifestyle Media Partners, Inc. operates in Other, based in New Canaan.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Lifestyle Media Partners, Inc. has raised $7.8M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $6.5M on 2013-05-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2015-07-29.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Lifestyle Media Partners, Inc. at approximately $6.1M (range $547K–$33M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.07× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2013–2015 (623 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 13 months.

Last raise 10.9 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 2.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 73% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 29% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Biloxi Baseball, LLC, United Sample Inc, Revolution Lighting Technologies, Inc., County Waste of Virginia, LLC, Marathon Patent Group, Inc..

Peoplefiled

10 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.