Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

L.I. Restaurant Associates, L.P.

L.I. Restaurant Associates, L.P. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

L.I. Restaurant Associates, L.P. operates in Restaurants, based in PORT WASHINGTON.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

L.I. Restaurant Associates, L.P. has raised $3.3M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).

Largest single filing: $2.9M on 2014-03-15.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-03-15.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models L.I. Restaurant Associates, L.P. at approximately $10M (range $2.2M–$79M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.63× the median modeled value of Seed Restaurants companies in 2013–2015 (101 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 19 months.

Last raise 12.3 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 13 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round stepped up 6.3× from the prior — scaling.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 80% of Restaurants peers (2292 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 83% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: MGE International Hospitality Group LLC, RDW Rudy's Fort Worth Limited Partnership, Monument Restaurants VII, LLC, Wingtime LLC, Eatery Green, LLC.

Peoplefiled

3 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.