Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Kill Cliff, Inc.

Kill Cliff, Inc. looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Kill Cliff, Inc. operates in Other, based in ATLANTA.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Kill Cliff, Inc. has raised $29M in disclosed capital across 5 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).

Largest single filing: $14M on 2017-08-08.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2019-09-05.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Kill Cliff, Inc. at approximately $13M (range $1.2M–$71M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.16× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2019–2021 (858 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Historic cadence: a new round about every 14 months.

Last raise 6.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.

The last round was 4.1× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 89% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 44% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: No More Landfills Investment Group, LLC, 3901 Campbellton Rd., LLC, medpai group, WestCap Bolt, LLC, HBC Management Class B L.P..

Peoplefiled

11 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.