Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
International Development Group Advisory Services, LLC
International Development Group Advisory Services, LLC looks under-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
International Development Group Advisory Services, LLC operates in Other, based in ARLINGTON.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
International Development Group Advisory Services, LLC has raised $975K in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).
Largest single filing: $750K on 2013-05-28.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2014-02-11.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models International Development Group Advisory Services, LLC at approximately $5.2M (range $150K–$59M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Under-valued. Modeled value is 0.64× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2013–2015 (1650 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 9 months.
Last raise 12.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 3.3× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 35% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 26% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Waterblue IV LLC, Fairway America Fund VI, LLC, LoanTek, Inc., Roosevelt Way Investment, L.P., West Coast Customs Inc.
Peoplefiled
6 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.