Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026
Instawares Holding Company, LLC
Instawares Holding Company, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
Instawares Holding Company, LLC operates in Other, based in WEST POINT.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
Instawares Holding Company, LLC has raised $24M in disclosed capital across 3 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Series A (a $4.0M–$15M round).
Largest single filing: $14M on 2011-05-20.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-05-20.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models Instawares Holding Company, LLC at approximately $204M (range $18M–$1.1B). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.25× the median modeled value of Series A Other companies in 2010–2012 (632 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 10 months.
Last raise 15.1 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round stepped up 1.8× from the prior — scaling.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 87% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 89% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Worldview Entertainment Capital Llc, Applied Merchant Systems West Coast, Inc., SWMF Life Science Venture Fund, Limited Partnership, PrimaLoft Holding Company, LLC, Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc..
Peoplefiled
17 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.