Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Imagen Center for Esthetic Dentistry Support Services, LLC

Imagen Center for Esthetic Dentistry Support Services, LLC looks over-valued against its niche peers and is at-risk on financing cadence.

WatchOverdue for a raise versus sector cadence — could be a bridge, a down round, or distress. Watch for the next filing.

Businessfiled

Imagen Center for Esthetic Dentistry Support Services, LLC operates in Other Health Care, based in SCOTTSDALE.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Imagen Center for Esthetic Dentistry Support Services, LLC has raised $886K in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $886K on 2023-08-31.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2023-08-31.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Imagen Center for Esthetic Dentistry Support Services, LLC at approximately $5.7M (range $555K–$25M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.22× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other Health Care companies in 2022–2024 (288 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 2.8 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 14 months.

Past due for a raise versus sector cadence — watch for distress or a bridge.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 31% of Other Health Care peers (5377 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 23% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Active Recovery TMS, LLC, Imagen Walled Lake Support Services, LLC, Pinnacle Integrated Medicine, Inc., Choix, Inc., DataBiologics, Inc..

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Overdue for a raise versus sector norm — distress or bridge risk.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.