Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 2, 2026

Ignition Cycle, Inc.

Ignition Cycle, Inc. looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.

DeprioritizeFinancing has gone silent well past the sector's normal cadence — treat as inactive until outside confirmation of a live operation.

Businessfiled

Ignition Cycle, Inc. operates in Other, based in LOS ALTOS.

Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.

No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.

Capital & rounds (filed)filed

Ignition Cycle, Inc. has raised $1.0M in disclosed capital across 1 recorded round, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Pre-Seed (a round under $1.0M).

Largest single filing: $1.0M on 2009-07-01.

Most recent recorded round closed around 2009-07-01.

Valuation (modeled)modeled

Provath models Ignition Cycle, Inc. at approximately $23M (range $667K–$262M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.

Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 2.88× the median modeled value of Pre-Seed Other companies in 2007–2009 (465 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.

Financing rhythm & timingmixed

Last raise 17.0 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.

Only one round on record and long silent — often defunct, acquired, or gone quiet.

Comparablesmixed

Capital scale ranks ahead of 37% of Other peers (25015 compared).

Modeled value ranks above 57% of those peers.

Closest niche peers: Miche Bag, LLC, Saint James CO, Soundbox Investment, LLC, Summit Brand Holdings, LLC, Alaska Juneau Aeronautics Inc.

Peoplefiled

2 named people on file across officers, directors and signatories.

Risks & flagsmixed

Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.

Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.

Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.

No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.