Diligence memo · auto-generated · as of July 3, 2026
House of Blue Leaves Broadway Ltd Liability Co
House of Blue Leaves Broadway Ltd Liability Co looks over-valued against its niche peers and is dormant on financing cadence.
Businessfiled
House of Blue Leaves Broadway Ltd Liability Co operates in Other, based in NEW YORK.
Sector still resolves to a broad 'Other' bucket, so operating comparables below are weaker than for a tightly-classified peer.
No verified homepage on file yet — operating evidence is limited to the public record.
Capital & rounds (filed)filed
House of Blue Leaves Broadway Ltd Liability Co has raised $5.9M in disclosed capital across 2 recorded rounds, aggregated from public filings. Its latest round is modeled as Seed (a $1.0M–$4.0M round).
Largest single filing: $3.0M on —.
Most recent recorded round closed around 2011-01-27.
Valuation (modeled)modeled
Provath models House of Blue Leaves Broadway Ltd Liability Co at approximately $54M (range $2.6M–$423M). This is an algorithmic estimate from round sizes and same-niche peers — not a quoted or reported figure.
Read: Over-valued. Modeled value is 1.61× the median modeled value of Seed Other companies in 2010–2012 (877 peers) — value vs value, same stage and era.
Financing rhythm & timingmixed
Historic cadence: a new round about every 493 months.
Last raise 15.4 yr ago; this sector typically re-raises about every 11 months.
Silent for over 3× the sector's normal cadence.
The last round was 1.0× smaller than the prior — a bridge or down round.
Comparablesmixed
Capital scale ranks ahead of 69% of Other peers (25015 compared).
Modeled value ranks above 73% of those peers.
Closest niche peers: Carsmetics Socal Group, Llc, Hot Flashes, LLC, Watermill-MPI Partners, L.P., Insituform Technologies Inc, Aquantis, Inc..
Peoplefiled
1 named person on file across officers, directors and signatories.
Risks & flagsmixed
Financing has been silent well beyond sector cadence — possibly defunct, acquired, or paused.
Modeled above niche peers — valuation risk on entry.
Broad sector classification weakens peer comparison.
No clearly named CEO/founder/principal in the surfaced records — key-person evidence is thin.